Lowering Valve Ownership Costs in Severe-Service Applications

Multiple DSS Guided Shear Gate valves displayed in a manufacturing facility, showing different sizes and actuator configurations.

As the authorized representative of DSS Valves in the Canadian Oil Sands, CGIS has supported multiple tailings applications where valve reliability directly impacts production, maintenance costs, and operational risk. This case study demonstrates how an application-driven, iterative valve design approach dramatically reduced lifecycle costs in a high-velocity, abrasive tailings service.

Rather than treating valve selection as a one-time equipment decision, CGIS and DSS worked collaboratively with the operator to analyze failures, modify designs, and continuously improve performance over multiple generations of Severe Service Knife Gate Valves (SSKGVs).

Application Overview

Service: Oil Sands Tailings

Valve Class: Class 300

Process Conditions:

  • Tonnage rate: 5,000 mtph
    • ~120,000 mtpd
    • ~43.8 million mtpy
  • Slurry density: 1.45–1.50 SG
  • Particle size:
    • D50 = 160–200 microns
    • Top size = 65 mm
  • Pressure: 25–40 bar
  • Velocity: >5 m/s (up to 8 m/s)

This combination of high velocity, large particle size, and elevated pressure represents a classic severe service tailings application where conventional knife gate valves routinely fail.

The Evolution: From Competitor Designs to Generation V SSKGV

Starting Point: Competitor Valve Designs

The original competitor valves installed in this service had a life expectancy of less than 7 months, resulting in:

  • Frequent replacements
  • High maintenance intervention
  • Annual valve costs exceeding $100,000 per valve location

While the initial capital cost appeared reasonable, the true cost of ownership was unacceptable.

Iterative SSKGV Development

CGIS and DSS introduced the Severe Service Knife Gate Valve and refined it over several generations, each addressing specific failure mechanisms observed in the field.

Original SSKGV

  • Improved baseline durability versus competitor designs
  • Extended valve life to ~2 years
  • Immediate reduction in annual valve cost

SSKGV Mod 1 – Material Strengthening

  • Targeted improvements to pressure-containing components
  • Addressed structural deformation under Class 300 conditions
  • Valve life increased to ~4 years

SSKGV Mod 2 – Wear Reduction Modifications

  • Enhanced wear surfaces in high-erosion zones
  • Reduced internal damage from coarse tailings
  • Valve life extended to ~5 years

SSKGV Mod 3 – Erosion Reduction Modifications

  • Flow-path and geometry refinements
  • Reduced localized velocity and particle impingement
  • Valve life increased to ~6 years

SSKGV Mod 4 – Generation V Design

  • Fully optimized design incorporating years of operating data
  • Balanced structural integrity, wear resistance, and erosion control
  • Achieved ~8 years of service life in the same application

Cost of Ownership Comparison

Lifecycle Cost Performance (Per Valve)

Design StageCAPEXLife ExpectancyCost per Year
Competitor Design$60,0000.58 yrs$102,857
Original SSKGV$70,0002 yrs$35,000
SSKGV Mod 1$80,0004 yrs$20,000
SSKGV Mod 2$83,0005 yrs$16,600
SSKGV Mod 3$85,0006 yrs$14,167
SSKGV Gen V$100,0008 yrs$12,500

Key Result:
Despite having the highest initial capital cost, the Generation V SSKGV delivered an ~88% reduction in annual valve cost compared to the original competitor design.

CGIS Takeaway

This case study reinforces a core CGIS principle:

The lowest cost valve is rarely the lowest cost solution.

By treating valve selection as an engineering and learning process, CGIS and DSS Valves transformed a chronic failure point into a predictable, long-life asset. The result was a step-change improvement in reliability and a dramatic reduction in total cost of ownership for Oil Sands tailings service.

 

Have a challenging valve application?

Talk to our team about your process conditions and see if a severe-service valve is the right fit for your operation.

Scroll to Top